Another Project for Collegetown: 114 Catherine Street

24 09 2014

114_catherine_1

Yet another project slated for Collegetown and its construction boom. In this case, it’s 114 Catherine Street. I discussed the background of the parcel in my last post, but I’ll do a one-sentence rehash – it’s a 10-bedroom apartment building in a CR-4 zone where parking isn’t required.

114_catherine_2

Now we have a design. Renders and sketch plan details here. Perhaps somewhat surprising, the new building doesn’t tear down the whole apartment building and take advantage of the full lot. the new 3-story, 4,180 sq ft, 17-bedroom addition will be placed in the front of the current building, replacing the street-abutting parking lot (hooray for that). There is one 5-bedroom unit on the first floor and a 6-bedroom unit on the second floor and the third floor. The design is by the prolific Collegetown firm Sharma Architecture. If they wanted to, they could probably add another floor, but in terms of length and width, this is pretty much it once you account for required lot setbacks and maximum permitted lot coverage.

114_catherine_3

114_catherine_4

Is the design going to win awards? Probably not. It’s not bad, though, and it’s certainly better than a parking lot. Since CR-4 doesn’t require parking, this parcel will lose 6 spaces of the current 14, and have only 8 spaces on the property. The old zoning would’ve required 18 parking spaces. Extra spaces would be available for rent in the parking lot northwest of the new building, on an adjacent parcel also owned by developer Lambrou Real Estate.

 


Actions

Information

3 responses

24 09 2014
Cornell PhD

“minimum setbacks”

For what? Collegetown long ago stopped being a suburbany community. That strip of grass is just going to wind up being another place for undergrads to play beer pong, like every other level surface in the neighborhood that’s not a traffic lane. Wish the developer could’ve gone for maximum buildout of the lot to reduce rents as much as possible.

25 09 2014
B. C.

I was surprised that the Lambrous aren’t even coming close to max buildout with this design. I played with some mental math earlier, and they could double the size of the proposed addition and still be comfortably within zoning.

As for the green strip, the intent is well-meaning, it’s the densest of the transition zones before the mixed use categories (MU-1 and MU-2).

10 10 2014
News Tidbits 10/10: Waiting For That Fall Slowdown | Ithacating in Cornell Heights

[…] Sharma has so many projects going they can’t keep in track. About the only difference from the old renders to these new ones is the addition of narrow windows into the brick face of the front facade, and […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: